list的轉(zhuǎn)map的另一種猜想
Java8使用lambda表達(dá)式進(jìn)行函數(shù)式編程可以對(duì)集合進(jìn)行非常方便的操作。一個(gè)比較常見的操作是將list轉(zhuǎn)換成map,一般使用Collectors的toMap()方法進(jìn)行轉(zhuǎn)換。一個(gè)比較常見的問題是當(dāng)list中含有相同元素的時(shí)候,如果不指定取哪一個(gè),則會(huì)拋出異常。因此,這個(gè)指定是必須的。Java面試寶典PDF完整版
當(dāng)然,使用toMap()的另一個(gè)重載方法,可以直接指定。這里,我們想討論的是另一種方法:在進(jìn)行轉(zhuǎn)map的操作之前,能不能使用distinct()先把list的重復(fù)元素過濾掉,然后轉(zhuǎn)map的時(shí)候就不用考慮重復(fù)元素的問題了。
使用distinct()給list去重
直接使用distinct(),失敗
package example.mystream;
import lombok.AllArgsConstructor;
import lombok.Getter;
import lombok.NoArgsConstructor;
import lombok.ToString;
import java.util.Arrays;
import java.util.List;
import java.util.Map;
import java.util.stream.Collectors;
public class ListToMap {
@AllArgsConstructor
@NoArgsConstructor
@ToString
private static class VideoInfo {
@Getter
String id;
int width;
int height;
}
public static void main(String [] args) {
List<VideoInfo> list = Arrays.asList(new VideoInfo("123", 1, 2),
new VideoInfo("456", 4, 5), new VideoInfo("123", 1, 2));
// preferred: handle duplicated data when toMap()
Map<String, VideoInfo> id2VideoInfo = list.stream().collect(
Collectors.toMap(VideoInfo::getId, x -> x,
(oldValue, newValue) -> newValue)
);
System.out.println("No Duplicated1: ");
id2VideoInfo.forEach((x, y) -> System.out.println("<" + x + ", " + y + ">"));
// handle duplicated data using distinct(), before toMap()
Map<String, VideoInfo> id2VideoInfo2 = list.stream().distinct().collect(
Collectors.toMap(VideoInfo::getId, x -> x)
);
System.out.println("No Duplicated2: ");
id2VideoInfo2.forEach((x, y) -> System.out.println("<" + x + ", " + y + ">"));
}
}
list里總共有三個(gè)元素,其中有兩個(gè)我們認(rèn)為是重復(fù)的。第一種轉(zhuǎn)換是使用toMap()直接指定了對(duì)重復(fù)key的處理情況,因此可以正常轉(zhuǎn)換成map。而第二種轉(zhuǎn)換是想先對(duì)list進(jìn)行去重,然后再轉(zhuǎn)換成map,結(jié)果還是失敗了,拋出了IllegalStateException,所以distinct()應(yīng)該是失敗了。
No Duplicated1:
<123, ListToMap.VideoInfo(id=123, width=1, height=2)>
<456, ListToMap.VideoInfo(id=456, width=4, height=5)>
Exception in thread "main" java.lang.IllegalStateException: Duplicate key ListToMap.VideoInfo(id=123, width=1, height=2)
at java.util.stream.Collectors.lambda$throwingMerger$0(Collectors.java:133)
at java.util.HashMap.merge(HashMap.java:1253)
at java.util.stream.Collectors.lambda$toMap$58(Collectors.java:1320)
at java.util.stream.ReduceOps$3ReducingSink.accept(ReduceOps.java:169)
at java.util.stream.DistinctOps$1$2.accept(DistinctOps.java:175)
at java.util.Spliterators$ArraySpliterator.forEachRemaining(Spliterators.java:948)
at java.util.stream.AbstractPipeline.copyInto(AbstractPipeline.java:481)
at java.util.stream.AbstractPipeline.wrapAndCopyInto(AbstractPipeline.java:471)
at java.util.stream.ReduceOps$ReduceOp.evaluateSequential(ReduceOps.java:708)
at java.util.stream.AbstractPipeline.evaluate(AbstractPipeline.java:234)
at java.util.stream.ReferencePipeline.collect(ReferencePipeline.java:499)
at example.mystream.ListToMap.main(ListToMap.java:79)
原因:distinct()依賴于equals()
查看distinct()的API,可以看到如下介紹:
Returns a stream consisting of the distinct elements (according to {@link Object#equals(Object)}) of this stream.
顯然,distinct()對(duì)對(duì)象進(jìn)行去重時(shí),是根據(jù)對(duì)象的equals()方法去處理的。如果我們的VideoInfo類不overrride超類Object的equals()方法,就會(huì)使用Object的。
但是Object的equals()方法只有在兩個(gè)對(duì)象完全相同時(shí)才返回true。而我們想要的效果是只要VideoInfo的id/width/height均相同,就認(rèn)為兩個(gè)videoInfo對(duì)象是同一個(gè)。所以我們比如重寫屬于videoInfo的equals()方法。
重寫equals()的注意事項(xiàng)
我們?cè)O(shè)計(jì)VideoInfo的equals()如下:
@Override
public boolean equals(Object obj) {
if (!(obj instanceof VideoInfo)) {
return false;
}
VideoInfo vi = (VideoInfo) obj;
return this.id.equals(vi.id)
&& this.width == vi.width
&& this.height == vi.height;
}
這樣一來,只要兩個(gè)videoInfo對(duì)象的三個(gè)屬性都相同,這兩個(gè)對(duì)象就相同了。歡天喜地去運(yùn)行程序,依舊失??!why?
《Effective Java》是本好書,連Java之父James Gosling都說,這是一本連他都需要的Java教程。在這本書中,作者指出,如果重寫了一個(gè)類的equals()方法,那么就必須一起重寫它的hashCode()方法!必須!沒有商量的余地!
必須使得重寫后的equals()滿足如下條件:
因?yàn)檫@是Java的規(guī)定,違背這些規(guī)定將導(dǎo)致Java程序運(yùn)行不再正常。
具體更多的細(xì)節(jié),建議大家讀讀原書,必定獲益匪淺。強(qiáng)烈推薦!
最終,我按照神書的指導(dǎo)設(shè)計(jì)VideoInfo的hashCode()方法如下:
@Override
public int hashCode() {
int n = 31;
n = n * 31 + this.id.hashCode();
n = n * 31 + this.height;
n = n * 31 + this.width;
return n;
}
終于,distinct()成功過濾了list中的重復(fù)元素,此時(shí)使用兩種toMap()將list轉(zhuǎn)換成map都是沒問題的:
No Duplicated1:
<123, ListToMap.VideoInfo(id=123, width=1, height=2)>
<456, ListToMap.VideoInfo(id=456, width=4, height=5)>
No Duplicated2:
<123, ListToMap.VideoInfo(id=123, width=1, height=2)>
<456, ListToMap.VideoInfo(id=456, width=4, height=5)>
引申
既然說distinct()是調(diào)用equals()進(jìn)行比較的,那按照我的理解,list的3個(gè)元素至少需要比較3次吧。那是不是就調(diào)用了3次equals()呢?
在equals()中加入一句打印,這樣就可以知道了。加后的equals()如下:
@Override
public boolean equals(Object obj) {
if (! (obj instanceof VideoInfo)) {
return false;
}
VideoInfo vi = (VideoInfo) obj;
System.out.println("<===> Invoke equals() ==> " + this.toString() + " vs. " + vi.toString());
return this.id.equals(vi.id) && this.width == vi.width && this.height == vi.height;
}
結(jié)果:
No Duplicated1:
<123, ListToMap.VideoInfo(id=123, width=1, height=2)>
<456, ListToMap.VideoInfo(id=456, width=4, height=5)>
<===> Invoke equals() ==> ListToMap.VideoInfo(id=123, width=1, height=2) vs. ListToMap.VideoInfo(id=123, width=1, height=2)
No Duplicated2:
<123, ListToMap.VideoInfo(id=123, width=1, height=2)>
<456, ListToMap.VideoInfo(id=456, width=4, height=5)>
結(jié)果發(fā)現(xiàn)才調(diào)用了一次equals()。為什么不是3次呢?仔細(xì)想想,根據(jù)hashCode()進(jìn)行比較,hashCode()相同的情況就一次,就是list的第一個(gè)元素和第三個(gè)元素(都是VideoInfo(id=123, width=1, height=2))會(huì)出現(xiàn)hashCode()相同的情況。
所以我們是不是可以這么猜想:只有當(dāng)hashCode()返回的hashCode相同的時(shí)候,才會(huì)調(diào)用equals()進(jìn)行更進(jìn)一步的判斷。如果連hashCode()返回的hashCode都不同,那么可以認(rèn)為這兩個(gè)對(duì)象一定就是不同的了!
驗(yàn)證猜想:
更改hashCode()如下:
@Override
public int hashCode() {
return 1;
}
這樣一來,所有的對(duì)象的hashCode()返回值都是相同的。當(dāng)然,這樣搞是符合Java規(guī)范的,因?yàn)镴ava只規(guī)定equals()相同的對(duì)象的hashCode必須相同,但是不同的對(duì)象的hashCode未必會(huì)不同。
結(jié)果:
No Duplicated1:
<123, ListToMap.VideoInfo(id=123, width=1, height=2)>
<456, ListToMap.VideoInfo(id=456, width=4, height=5)>
<===> Invoke equals() ==> ListToMap.VideoInfo(id=456, width=4, height=5) vs. ListToMap.VideoInfo(id=123, width=1, height=2)
<===> Invoke equals() ==> ListToMap.VideoInfo(id=456, width=4, height=5) vs. ListToMap.VideoInfo(id=123, width=1, height=2)
<===> Invoke equals() ==> ListToMap.VideoInfo(id=123, width=1, height=2) vs. ListToMap.VideoInfo(id=123, width=1, height=2)
No Duplicated2:
<123, ListToMap.VideoInfo(id=123, width=1, height=2)>
<456, ListToMap.VideoInfo(id=456, width=4, height=5)>
果然,equals()調(diào)用了三次!看來的確只有hashCode相同的時(shí)候才會(huì)調(diào)用equal()進(jìn)一步判斷兩個(gè)對(duì)象究竟是否相同;如果hashCode不相同,兩個(gè)對(duì)象顯然不相同。猜想是正確的。
結(jié)論
-
list轉(zhuǎn)map推薦使用toMap(),并且無論是否會(huì)出現(xiàn)重復(fù)的問題,都要指定重復(fù)后的取舍規(guī)則,不費(fèi)功夫但受益無窮;
-
對(duì)一個(gè)自定義的class使用distinct(),切記覆寫equals()方法;
-
覆寫equals(),一定要覆寫hashCode();
-
雖然設(shè)計(jì)出一個(gè)hashCode()可以簡單地讓其return 1,這樣并不會(huì)違反Java規(guī)定,但是這樣做會(huì)導(dǎo)致很多惡果。比如將這樣的對(duì)象存入hashMap的時(shí)候,所有的對(duì)象的hashCode都相同,最終所有對(duì)象都存儲(chǔ)在hashMap的同一個(gè)桶中,直接將hashMap惡化成了一個(gè)鏈表。從而O(1)的復(fù)雜度被整成了O(n)的,性能自然大大下降。
-
好書是程序猿進(jìn)步的階梯?!郀柣?。比如《Effecctive Java》。
最終參考程序:
package example.mystream;
import lombok.AllArgsConstructor;
import lombok.Getter;
import lombok.NoArgsConstructor;
import lombok.ToString;
import java.util.Arrays;
import java.util.List;
import java.util.Map;
import java.util.stream.Collectors;
public class ListToMap {
@AllArgsConstructor
@NoArgsConstructor
@ToString
private static class VideoInfo {
@Getter
String id;
int width;
int height;
public static void main(String [] args) {
System.out.println(new VideoInfo("123", 1, 2).equals(new VideoInfo("123", 1, 2)));
}
@Override
public boolean equals(Object obj) {
if (!(obj instanceof VideoInfo)) {
return false;
}
VideoInfo vi = (VideoInfo) obj;
return this.id.equals(vi.id)
&& this.width == vi.width
&& this.height == vi.height;
}
/**
* If equals() is override, hashCode() must be override, too.
* 1. if a equals b, they must have the same hashCode;
* 2. if a doesn't equals b, they may have the same hashCode;
* 3. hashCode written in this way can be affected by sequence of the fields;
* 3. 2^5 - 1 = 31. So 31 will be faster when do the multiplication,
* because it can be replaced by bit-shifting: 31 * i = (i << 5) - i.
* @return
*/
@Override
public int hashCode() {
int n = 31;
n = n * 31 + this.id.hashCode();
n = n * 31 + this.height;
n = n * 31 + this.width;
return n;
}
}
public static void main(String [] args) {
List<VideoInfo> list = Arrays.asList(new VideoInfo("123", 1, 2),
new VideoInfo("456", 4, 5), new VideoInfo("123", 1, 2));
// preferred: handle duplicated data when toMap()
Map<String, VideoInfo> id2VideoInfo = list.stream().collect(
Collectors.toMap(VideoInfo::getId, x -> x,
(oldValue, newValue) -> newValue)
);
System.out.println("No Duplicated1: ");
id2VideoInfo.forEach((x, y) -> System.out.println("<" + x + ", " + y + ">"));
// handle duplicated data using distinct(), before toMap()
// Note that distinct() relies on equals() in the object
// if you override equals(), hashCode() must be override together
Map<String, VideoInfo> id2VideoInfo2 = list.stream().distinct().collect(
Collectors.toMap(VideoInfo::getId, x -> x)
);
System.out.println("No Duplicated2: ");
id2VideoInfo2.forEach((x, y) -> System.out.println("<" + x + ", " + y + ">"));
}
}
再拓展
假設(shè)類是別人的,不能修改
以上,VideoInfo使我們自己寫的類,我們可以往里添加equals()和hashCode()方法。如果VideoInfo是我們引用的依賴中的一個(gè)類,我們無權(quán)對(duì)其進(jìn)行修改,那么是不是就沒辦法使用distinct()按照某些元素是否相同,對(duì)對(duì)象進(jìn)行自定義的過濾了呢?
使用wrapper
在stackoverflow的一個(gè)回答上,我們可以找到一個(gè)可行的方法:使用wrapper。
假設(shè)在一個(gè)依賴中(我們無權(quán)修改該類),VideoInfo定義如下:
@AllArgsConstructor
@NoArgsConstructor
@ToString
public class VideoInfo {
@Getter
String id;
int width;
int height;
}
使用剛剛的wrapper思路,寫程序如下(當(dāng)然,為了程序的可運(yùn)行性,還是把VideoInfo放進(jìn)來了,假設(shè)它就是不能修改的,不能為其添加任何方法):
package example.mystream;
import lombok.AllArgsConstructor;
import lombok.Getter;
import lombok.NoArgsConstructor;
import lombok.ToString;
import java.util.Arrays;
import java.util.List;
import java.util.Map;
import java.util.stream.Collectors;
public class DistinctByWrapper {
private static class VideoInfoWrapper {
private final VideoInfo videoInfo;
public VideoInfoWrapper(VideoInfo videoInfo) {
this.videoInfo = videoInfo;
}
public VideoInfo unwrap() {
return videoInfo;
}
@Override
public boolean equals(Object obj) {
if (!(obj instanceof VideoInfo)) {
return false;
}
VideoInfo vi = (VideoInfo) obj;
return videoInfo.id.equals(vi.id)
&& videoInfo.width == vi.width
&& videoInfo.height == vi.height;
}
@Override
public int hashCode() {
int n = 31;
n = n * 31 + videoInfo.id.hashCode();
n = n * 31 + videoInfo.height;
n = n * 31 + videoInfo.width;
return n;
}
}
public static void main(String [] args) {
List<VideoInfo> list = Arrays.asList(new VideoInfo("123", 1, 2),
new VideoInfo("456", 4, 5), new VideoInfo("123", 1, 2));
// VideoInfo --map()--> VideoInfoWrapper ----> distinct(): VideoInfoWrapper --map()--> VideoInfo
Map<String, VideoInfo> id2VideoInfo = list.stream()
.map(VideoInfoWrapper::new).distinct().map(VideoInfoWrapper::unwrap)
.collect(
Collectors.toMap(VideoInfo::getId, x -> x,
(oldValue, newValue) -> newValue)
);
id2VideoInfo.forEach((x, y) -> System.out.println("<" + x + ", " + y + ">"));
}
}
/**
* Assume that VideoInfo is a class that we can't modify
*/
@AllArgsConstructor
@NoArgsConstructor
@ToString
class VideoInfo {
@Getter
String id;
int width;
int height;
}
整個(gè)wrapper的思路無非就是構(gòu)造另一個(gè)類VideoInfoWrapper,把hashCode()和equals()添加到wrapper中,這樣便可以按照自定義規(guī)則對(duì)wrapper對(duì)象進(jìn)行自定義的過濾。
搜索Java知音公眾號(hào),回復(fù)“后端面試”,送你一份Java面試題寶典.pdf
我們沒法自定義過濾VideoInfo,但是我們可以自定義過濾VideoInfoWrapper啊!
之后要做的,就是將VideoInfo全部轉(zhuǎn)化為VideoInfoWrapper,然后過濾掉某些VideoInfoWrapper,再將剩下的VideoInfoWrapper轉(zhuǎn)回VideoInfo,以此達(dá)到過濾VideoInfo的目的。很巧妙!
使用“filter() + 自定義函數(shù)”取代distinct()
另一種更精妙的實(shí)現(xiàn)方式是自定義一個(gè)函數(shù):
private static <T> Predicate<T> distinctByKey(Function<? super T, Object> keyExtractor) {
Map<Object, Boolean> map = new ConcurrentHashMap<>();
return t -> map.putIfAbsent(keyExtractor.apply(t), Boolean.TRUE) == null;
}
(輸入元素的類型是T及其父類,keyExtracctor是映射函數(shù),返回Object,整個(gè)傳入的函數(shù)的功能應(yīng)該是提取key的。distinctByKey函數(shù)返回的是Predicate函數(shù),類型為T。)
這個(gè)函數(shù)傳入一個(gè)函數(shù)(lambda),對(duì)傳入的對(duì)象提取key,然后嘗試將key放入concurrentHashMap,如果能放進(jìn)去,說明此key之前沒出現(xiàn)過,函數(shù)返回false;如果不能放進(jìn)去,說明這個(gè)key和之前的某個(gè)key重復(fù)了,函數(shù)返回true。
這個(gè)函數(shù)最終作為filter()函數(shù)的入?yún)ⅰ8鶕?jù)Java API可知filter(func)過濾的規(guī)則為:如果func為true,則過濾,否則不過濾。因此,通過“filter() + 自定義的函數(shù)”,凡是重復(fù)的key都返回true,并被filter()過濾掉,最終留下的都是不重復(fù)的。Java面試寶典PDF完整版
最終實(shí)現(xiàn)的程序如下
package example.mystream;
import lombok.AllArgsConstructor;
import lombok.Getter;
import lombok.NoArgsConstructor;
import lombok.ToString;
import java.util.Arrays;
import java.util.List;
import java.util.Map;
import java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentHashMap;
import java.util.function.Function;
import java.util.function.Predicate;
import java.util.stream.Collectors;
public class DistinctByFilterAndLambda {
public static void main(String[] args) {
List<VideoInfo> list = Arrays.asList(new VideoInfo("123", 1, 2),
new VideoInfo("456", 4, 5), new VideoInfo("123", 1, 2));
// Get distinct only
Map<String, VideoInfo> id2VideoInfo = list.stream().filter(distinctByKey(vi -> vi.getId())).collect(
Collectors.toMap(VideoInfo::getId, x -> x,
(oldValue, newValue) -> newValue)
);
id2VideoInfo.forEach((x, y) -> System.out.println("<" + x + ", " + y + ">"));
}
/**
* If a key could not be put into ConcurrentHashMap, that means the key is duplicated
* @param keyExtractor a mapping function to produce keys
* @param <T> the type of the input elements
* @return true if key is duplicated; else return false
*/
private static <T> Predicate<T> distinctByKey(Function<? super T, Object> keyExtractor) {
Map<Object, Boolean> map = new ConcurrentHashMap<>();
return t -> map.putIfAbsent(keyExtractor.apply(t), Boolean.TRUE) == null;
}
}
/**
* Assume that VideoInfo is a class that we can't modify
*/
@AllArgsConstructor
@NoArgsConstructor
@ToString
class VideoInfo {
@Getter
String id;
int width;
int height;
}